Red Paper
International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology
  • Printed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
P-ISSN: 2664-3766
E-ISSN: 2664-3774
Peer Reviewed Journal
Journal is inviting manuscripts for its coming issue. Contact us for more details.

2018, Vol. 1, Issue 2, Part A

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of nebulized dexmedetomidine and nebulized ketamine as premedication in pediatric surgery


Author(s): Kartheek Hajeebu SSS and S Vikram Rao

Abstract:

Background and Objective: Preoperative anxiety and separation from parents remain persistent challenges for anesthesiologists managing pediatric patients. Dexmedetomidine (DexM), a selective ?2-adrenoceptor agonist, exerts sedative and analgesic effects through central nervous system (CNS) pathways. Ketamine (KET), an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, induces sedation and dissociative anesthesia. Aerosolized drug delivery offers a noninvasive, well-tolerated, and cost-effective route with rapid systemic absorption. The present study aimed to compare the sedative efficacy and safety of aerosolized Dexmedetomidine versus aerosolized Ketamine as premedicants prior to general anesthesia in children undergoing elective surgery.

Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 75 pediatric patients (both sexes, aged 3-10 years) classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. All participants were scheduled for elective surgical procedures lasting 30-90 minutes under general anesthesia. Subjects were randomly allocated into three equal groups; Group D (DexM) that received aerosolized Dexmedetomidine 3 µg/kg, Group K (KET) that received aerosolized Ketamine 3 mg/kg, Group C (Control) that received aerosolized normal saline.

Results: After 15 minutes of nebulization, Ramsay sedation scores were comparable between DexM and KET groups. At 30 minutes, DexM achieved significantly higher sedation scores compared to KET. DexM also demonstrated superior parental separation and mask acceptance compared with KET. Heart rate (HR) prior to anesthesia induction was significantly lower in the DexM group versus KET and control groups, indicating greater hemodynamic stability. Recovery and discharge times did not differ significantly among the three groups. Hypersalivation was observed more frequently with Ketamine, while the incidence of other adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, or hypoxia) was negligible across all groups.

Conclusion: Aerosolized Dexmedetomidine provides superior preoperative sedation, smoother parental separation, and improved mask acceptance compared to aerosolized Ketamine in pediatric patients, without prolonging recovery or discharge time. It can be considered an effective and well-tolerated premedication option in pediatric anesthesia.
Pages: 88-91 | Views: 59 | Downloads: 32

Download Full Article: Click Here

International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology
How to cite this article:
Kartheek Hajeebu SSS, S Vikram Rao. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of nebulized dexmedetomidine and nebulized ketamine as premedication in pediatric surgery. Int J Med Anesthesiology 2018;1(2):88-91.
Call for book chapter
International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology