International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology
  • Printed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
P-ISSN: 2664-3766
E-ISSN: 2664-3774
Peer Reviewed Journal
Journal is inviting manuscripts for its coming issue. Contact us for more details.

2024, Vol. 7, Issue 3, Part B

Continuous spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in sepsis diagnosed patients


Author(s): Mahmoud Rashad Ahmed, Ahmed Ali El Daba, Reda Sobhy Salama Abdelrahman and Aliaa Muhammad Belal

Abstract: Sepsis is characterized as a severe condition when the body's response to infection becomes uncontrolled, leading to life-threatening organ malfunction. Septic shock, on the other hand, is a specific type of sepsis that involves ongoing low blood pressure. Patients suffering from sepsis may experience unstable blood flow dynamics, and the administration of anesthetic may cause significant low blood pressure as a result of blood vessel dilatation and reduced heart function. Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) may lead to reduced hypotension and decreased need for vasopressors in comparison to volatile general anesthesia. CSA and combined spinal epidural anesthesia are secure and dependable types of anesthesia.

DOI: 10.33545/26643766.2024.v7.i3b.489

Pages: 87-89 | Views: 463 | Downloads: 242

Download Full Article: Click Here

International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology
How to cite this article:
Mahmoud Rashad Ahmed, Ahmed Ali El Daba, Reda Sobhy Salama Abdelrahman, Aliaa Muhammad Belal. Continuous spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in sepsis diagnosed patients. Int J Med Anesthesiology 2024;7(3):87-89. DOI: 10.33545/26643766.2024.v7.i3b.489
Call for book chapter
International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology